Meta


MetaFriday 24 August 2007 07:24

Recent problems with access to this site have led us to move to a new server. I mention this only because I know that some visitors were getting error pages of various flavors both before and after the move, rather than the urinating toddlers and defeatist screeds they’d expected. I hope that all the access problems, which both precipitated the move and resulted from it, have now been resolved. Being a realist, however, I know this may not be the case so please let us know via email (sgazzetti and gmail but with an ‘at’ sign between them) if you continue to have any problems with this site. Technical problems, I mean, not quarrels with our parenting techniques.

Thanks to all who alerted us to the problems. We rely on your input to keep those defeatist screeds coming.

Mysteries/vexations & MetaMonday 19 March 2007 15:49

Picture 1.png

If an analogy were necessary, I would say that I have just completed the blog equivalent of replacing the transmission using a bent pair of pliers and a butterknife. I let the two-year anniversary of this site pass without mention, but that unmarked occasion rekindled in me the sense of the lazy, the Luddite, and the pessimist that arises whenever I think about updating the blogging engine that makes this site run. It’s been over 15 months since the last major update was released, and I’ve been avoiding installing it ever since.

It wasn’t an uncharacteristic sense of competence that finally convinced me to do the upgrade, but rather a sudden eruption of cranky bugs in the old version. The site’s appearance was taken hostage and WordPress claimed to have no idea where the necessary files were although I could see them sitting right there on the remote server. In fact, for the last week or so no one should have been able to see the site at all, according to WordPress 1.5. After trying to work out why, and fooling around for longer than seemed reasonable, I figured that if I was going to waste that kind of time I might as well waste it thoroughly and do a full data backup and upgrade to the just-released WordPress 2.1.2. The touted “Five-Step Upgrade” turned into a much more involved project than advertised, though I was more or less prepared for that (see ‘pessimist’ above).

I mention all of this not because of the radical redesign (the appearance, after much cursing and uploading, finally returns to the theme of the last year, and you shouldn’t see anything new), but to ask the help of our various readers in identifying bugs, if any; when I first assembled from chewing gum and coathangers installed the comment preview page there were some problems various readers alerted me to, for example, and then there was the famous lame-browser display issue more recently. So please drop us a comment (if possible) or an email should this upgrade in any way impinge on your isoglossia experience.

And I had hoped to have time to do some really important blogging business today, such as posting some amusing pictures of pugs or kitties.

Mysteries/vexations & MetaFriday 12 January 2007 11:42

In the last post I described installing Parallels and running Windows on the Mac as an overall positive experience. Regular readers will know that I avoid using Internet Explorer if at all possible, but with a new install that’s all you’ve got, and the first thing I use it for is going to Mozilla to download Firefox. Yesterday I happened to see this site in IE, however, and I was surprised to find the entire sidebar missing.

I looked around for it, though, and finally found it hiding down at the bottom of the page. This is not the first time I’ve had issues with IE accepting the rickety hand-coding of the site. So I started tweaking the code to see if I could make the sidebar return to its rightful place, and in the process I began looking at it in various browsers. I even downloaded Internet Explorer for Mac — which seems like the worst kind of oxymoron to me, but anything in the name of research. Running that (version 5.2, which is the most recent version available for Mac) I was even more annoyed to see that not only is the sidebar hanging off the bottom of the page, but the header photo doesn’t load. Here’s the site in Firefox, as it is meant to appear:

FF 2.0.0.1 MAC

Compare that with IE 5.2 for Mac:

IE 5.2 MAC

Notice the subtle differences?

A few small adjustments to the stylesheet returned the sidebar in IE 6.0 for Windows, but not in IE 5.2 for Mac. Things appear normal in all browsers I am able to use except this one. While I work on this, I am very keen to know what you, dear reader, do or do not see. I’d really appreciate it if you could please take a minute to leave a comment indicating:

  1. What browser (IE, FF, Safari, Opera) you’re using
  2. On what platform (Windows 9X, XP, Vista, OS X, etc) you’re using it
  3. Where the sidebar is (as shown in the upper picture, or way down at the bottom?)
  4. Does a header photo load, or is the top of the page all white space?

Many thanks in advance.

IE for Mac

Lists & MetaThursday 30 November 2006 02:01

Here you’ll find what is surely the most original idea for a post on this, the last day of November.

Especially alert readers will have noticed that there’s been a new post here every damn day this month. This is because I accidentally signed up for an activity called “NaBloPoMo” or something similar. I am still not entirely clear on why I did this or how it came to be, but lacking definite answers to the lingering questions on that score, I’ll blame Laid-Off Dad, whose site I began reading around the same time I found that I’d committed myself to posting every day throughout the month of November (so that acronym up there probably means something like “National Blog Posting Month”, in case you’re not really paying attention, like I wasn’t).

calendar 28 nov.jpg

Actually, it wasn’t nearly as difficult as I thought it would be when November 1st dawned. By the end of the first week I had a pretty decent editorial calendar roughed out, and within a few days many posts were in the pipeline, which is to say already pre-quarter-baked. If time permitted I baked them a little more. If not, not. I didn’t really need to do anything differently this month, except to be slightly less lazy, marginally more organized, and significantly less obsessed with proofreading. If the photos, conversations, posting-to-the-future, and other tactics I used to get through NaBloPoMo were cheating, then I’m cheating all the time and you by extension are soiling yourself, ethically speaking, by even reading this.

The official rules of this activity (which is a new adjunct to the eight-year-old NaNoWriMo) don’t say what does or does not constitute ‘cheating’, and they couldn’t be much simpler: post every day. I added my own rule to this: don’t post every day about the fact that you are posting every day. The organizer put up a randomizer to direct you (at random) to the billions and billions of participating sites, and I quickly found a strong negative correlation between overt mention of NaBloPoMo and the likelihood that I would enjoy the content of the place where I found myself randomly deposited. So I made my own rule: save all this meta-talk about how OMG I’m like totally posting everyday! for the end of the month.

Another rule: do it without pimping out my child overmuch.

I also found a lot of stuff out there, not necessarily cat- or yarn-related, that I did not want to read, no matter how large I tried to make my heart. Maybe someday when I am feeling especially misanthropic I will post a list of things that will cause me to click on through before your site has even finished loading.

1470 Newsfire.jpg

Overall I enjoyed having some pressure brought to bear, some RIGOR, as a colleague would say, and I think it was probably good for breaking out of a rut — note that November’s post total is greater than the previous three months’ combined. I spent a good deal less time over-editing this month, and enjoyed having a bit more spontaneity injected into the process of posting. The pressure decreased as the month went on, and by the middle of the term of commitment I had more than enough posts or ideas in progress to make it through without whining or panicking. During this month, though, my regular reading habit suffered tremendously.

It occurs to me that this event, assuming it’s to be repeated, should be renamed to reflect its international scope. (For some reason most of the good blogs I stumbled upon in the last 30 days turned out to be, well, Canadian). I realize that InternaBloPoMo doesn’t have quite the same ring, but what about GloBloPoMo?

Don’t be surprised if the pace around here slackens somewhat in December.

This day in history & MetaTuesday 28 February 2006 13:41

One year ago, I had only a vague idea of what a ‘blog’ was. I did not read any blogs at all aside from two maintained by old friends, which allowed me to more or less keep up with their lives. Their blogs served as a sort of email supplement, but that’s as far as it went. Ever the Luddite late-adopter, I started this website one year ago today for reasons that remain unclear.

Copping to the B-word

Wait, now I remember. There was something about a baby, a very needy baby, who was taking up so much of our attention that our friends and families began to assume we’d fallen into a bottomless Karstic sinkhole. So this blog[1] seemed a lazy way out, an economy of scale for disseminating information about and pictures of our vomit-flecked and sleepless existence, for those few who could stomach the documention of same.

Any readers who have blogs of their own (and that’s 75% of you, as far as I can tell — more stats below) know quite well that maintaining one of these electronic navels for gazing into is not quite the time-saver you might first think. In retrospect I am baffled as to how I managed to find the time to simply get it up and running, never mind actually write anything. I do recall a few near-all-nighters last February during which I wrestled endlessly with tiny bits of }css{ and resized images and tracked down hex codes for burnt sienna and so on. If nothing else, maintaining this site has made me a much more efficient user of the internet. I’ve learned a great deal about maximizing bookmarks and browser tabs & extensions, search engines & on-line references, as well as various sites which a year ago I’d never heard of: Flickr, Technorati, del.icio.us, Bloglines, WordPress Codex, and on and on. Keeping this site going has also made us more discerning consumers of our own photographs, which has had its own follow-on effects for the better.

But the biggest change in my internet habits in the last year
[2] has been the reading of other people’s blogs. When I started this little island of self-absorption I had no idea about the billions and billions of other people out there doing projects that were similar, only interesting. What began as a trickle of browsing progressed to regular reading, and now there are not only a generous handful of friends and family whose blogs I use for keeping in contact, but also numerous strangers out there whose lives I keep up with on a daily basis — people I’ll never meet. Some of them know I’m out here. Others have anywhere between no clue and fawning assurances that their postings bring me joy, whether they are daily-as-sunrise, reliable as the newspaper, or long awaited with great anticipation. It’s a very interesting way to know people without having to actually deal with them.

This project has also yielded some human interaction, too. It was only a few months old when some other foreigner-bloggers in Slovenia tracked me down and dragged my misanthropic ass out for bowling (of all things) and beer (mmm, beer…) Via the magic of email and comments I’ve also cyber-met many people I wouldn’t otherwise have known existed.

Year in review — pseudo-stats

As promised above, some more statistics:

  • As of this posting, there are approximately 100,000,000 blogs in the ‘blogosphere’
  • On average, a new blog is started every single second
  • 25% of new blogs are abandoned within the first year
  • 66% of blogs go without an update for over a month
  • 87% of blog content consists of reasons for not posting more, sorry people, but things have been like, all crazy around here.
  • 98% of blogs kind of suck[3]
  • Reading the other 2% takes up way too much time

These statistics are only partly made-up, but any actual information contained within them comes from the internet, so it’s a bit like the fox guarding the henhouse here.

Your #1 stop for tits + “nova gorica”

Before I began this post I stopped by isoglossia’s in-house statistical analysis division and asked the chief for some ore from the year’s datamines. Here now, the dross:

  • The year’s posts number 156, or an average of a post every 56 hours. I’m generally satisfied with this, considering our month’s absence in August, pressing family matters in the fall & winter, and Adam’s unabated neediness
  • The word ‘Adam’ appears in 38% of all posts, not including this one
  • ‘Buckwheat’ is used in five posts
  • ‘Malkovich’ appears in four posts
  • The year’s post which generated the most comments was also the most complicated one, Java-wise.
  • 78% of our readers are equally divided between Slovenia and the U.S., followed by Spain, Poland and Japan as top isoglossia-reading nations.
  • 66% of you use some version of Firefox. Yay!
  • isoglossia yields high-ranking search results for strings like:
  • I hope you like the changes to the layout to mark our second year here. The look has gone through ten amateurish variations, which can be seen here, for all you sentimentalists

This is not meant to be self-congratulatory, other than the part about having dodged that ‘25% of all blogs fail’ statistic. Despite the year’s many bouts of infrequent posting, this period has seen a small but loyal fanbase build up, and I thank you all for taking time from your obviously not-all-that-busy schedules to drop by now and then to read about our flecks of vomit and shaking tiny fists of rage.

The next baby, I promise we’ll be documenting in far greater detail.

[1] Yes, I give up. It’s a blog, already.
[2] As always when I make a sweeping statement like this, I have in mind the qualification “not including Adam-related factors”
[3] Not yours, of course.

Next Page »


FireStats iconPowered by FireStats