<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser headaches &#8212; includes survey!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:02:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Istarian</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-9067</link>
		<dc:creator>Istarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-9067</guid>
		<description>In response to you entry:

1. Firefox
2. Windows XP Home Edition, I&#039;d rather be using linux, but I&#039;m far more comfortable with Windows, having used it since near the end if Windows 3.1
3. no sidebar, see #1
4. It looks just like you say it ought to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to you entry:</p>
<p>1. Firefox<br />
2. Windows XP Home Edition, I&#8217;d rather be using linux, but I&#8217;m far more comfortable with Windows, having used it since near the end if Windows 3.1<br />
3. no sidebar, see #1<br />
4. It looks just like you say it ought to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaoo</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8426</link>
		<dc:creator>gaoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-8426</guid>
		<description>We used to have problems w/ loading in IE on OS9 (?)-also clamshell albeit &quot;blueberry&quot; -sidebars would be gray, like a halftone, or sometimes blank. I think you witnessed this on our old, sadly departed laptop and were infuriated. It also took forever for photos to load and sometimes they didn&#039;t.
Now w/ Safari in OSX all is ok.
I assume.
Oh well I guess you won&#039;t have time for this sort of dicking around anymore anyway. (CONGRATULATIONS! and much love)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used to have problems w/ loading in IE on OS9 (?)-also clamshell albeit &#8220;blueberry&#8221; -sidebars would be gray, like a halftone, or sometimes blank. I think you witnessed this on our old, sadly departed laptop and were infuriated. It also took forever for photos to load and sometimes they didn&#8217;t.<br />
Now w/ Safari in OSX all is ok.<br />
I assume.<br />
Oh well I guess you won&#8217;t have time for this sort of dicking around anymore anyway. (CONGRATULATIONS! and much love)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuuli</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8356</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuuli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-8356</guid>
		<description>Safari - OSX - All good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari &#8211; OSX &#8211; All good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdog</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8333</link>
		<dc:creator>jdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-8333</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re just baiting me, aren&#039;t you, you minx.  Until we get settled into our house and I get my personal computer set up again, I view you on IE, Windows XP, and it looks pretty much as it should--sidebar is up at the side, header photo is there.  I have occasionally had the sidebar come all the way at the bottom, but I don&#039;t know why because I don&#039;t change browsers or anything.  And the header photo is always there.

But, just now as I&#039;m writing this, the page has turned green.  Seriously green.  St. Pat&#039;s is a long ways off yet, brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re just baiting me, aren&#8217;t you, you minx.  Until we get settled into our house and I get my personal computer set up again, I view you on IE, Windows XP, and it looks pretty much as it should&#8211;sidebar is up at the side, header photo is there.  I have occasionally had the sidebar come all the way at the bottom, but I don&#8217;t know why because I don&#8217;t change browsers or anything.  And the header photo is always there.</p>
<p>But, just now as I&#8217;m writing this, the page has turned green.  Seriously green.  St. Pat&#8217;s is a long ways off yet, brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagosaurus</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagosaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-8291</guid>
		<description>1. Firefox 2.0
   2. OS X (10.4.8 to be precise)
   3 &amp; 4. Everything is where it should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Firefox 2.0<br />
   2. OS X (10.4.8 to be precise)<br />
   3 &amp; 4. Everything is where it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgazzetti</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8289</link>
		<dc:creator>sgazzetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-8289</guid>
		<description>Thanks all. It&#039;s appearing that the problem is limited to IE 5 on Mac, and if that&#039;s the case I can live with such a small amount of khaki-chafe. Everyone knows that only a felon would run IE on a Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all. It&#8217;s appearing that the problem is limited to IE 5 on Mac, and if that&#8217;s the case I can live with such a small amount of khaki-chafe. Everyone knows that only a felon would run IE on a Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juliloquy</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8288</link>
		<dc:creator>juliloquy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-8288</guid>
		<description>Firefox all the way, both on Windows and my &quot;antique&quot; clamshell iBook (orange, from 2000). Man, that must chafe your khakis to be so seriously misrepresented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox all the way, both on Windows and my &#8220;antique&#8221; clamshell iBook (orange, from 2000). Man, that must chafe your khakis to be so seriously misrepresented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kilowatthour</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8287</link>
		<dc:creator>kilowatthour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-8287</guid>
		<description>xp + firefox. all appears as it should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xp + firefox. all appears as it should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave cunningham</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8281</link>
		<dc:creator>dave cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-8281</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m here in japan just now, using firefox 2.0.0.1 on a macbook, macos x 10.4.8 and the page looks as it should, per your ff example. ie for mac is just too too painful, imho. i don&#039;t know of anyone who uses it. heck, i don&#039;t really know of anyone of any intelligence who uses anything but firefox. not to say that i don&#039;t know people who use ie, but note the qualifier.  regards, and keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m here in japan just now, using firefox 2.0.0.1 on a macbook, macos x 10.4.8 and the page looks as it should, per your ff example. ie for mac is just too too painful, imho. i don&#8217;t know of anyone who uses it. heck, i don&#8217;t really know of anyone of any intelligence who uses anything but firefox. not to say that i don&#8217;t know people who use ie, but note the qualifier.  regards, and keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://isoglossia.com/2007/01/12/browser-headaches-includes-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-8277</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://isoglossia.com/?p=485#comment-8277</guid>
		<description>Win XP, IE, looks fine (sidebars and header image present and correct). But I do seem to remember at some point in the past that the sidebar was way down at the bottom, after the posts. 
Ok now though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Win XP, IE, looks fine (sidebars and header image present and correct). But I do seem to remember at some point in the past that the sidebar was way down at the bottom, after the posts.<br />
Ok now though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

