We went camping a lot when I was a kid. My parents had five kids right in a row before they figured out what was causing them. This was bad for them but great for us; it’s amazing how efficiently little kids can construct the perfect society when there are so damn many of them, and being so close together in age meant that we were pretty good company for each other most of the time. Small conflicts did erupt from time to time, especially as we spent a lot of time packed into the car on the way to campgrounds — “Mahm, she’s breathing my air!”, “He’s vomiting on me!”, “She started it!”, that kind of thing. But mostly we looked out for each other.
When we arrived at a campground, the single most important piece of information concerned the possibility of swimming: was there, within a two-mile radius, a lake, river, canal, reservoir, swimming pool, kiddy pool, horse trough, dog-dish, hog-wallow, anything we could get wet in? That was priority one.
The second thing everyone needed to know was: is it the pinchy kind?
The origins of this term are lost in the mists of time, but the pinchy kind referred to a non-flushing toilet, what normal speakers of English would call an outhouse. I am sure that the genesis of our name for it lies in some colorfully humiliating event suffered by one of my many sisters, and if any of them can recall it they are strongly encouraged to comment.
Just as the first child to catch any whiff of water, salt, fresh, or brackish, was duty-bound to immediately report it to the rest, so was the first to succumb to nature’s call required to deliver the news, ordinarily with a sort of grim stoicism, “It’s the pinchy kind“.
The reasons for shunning the pinchy kind are legion. My gravest fear as a small child was ‘spider bite on ass‘, or even just plain ‘spider on ass‘
I am moved to remember all this in part because this term the pinchy kind is yet another flapping owl (as that term is used by me), but also because toilets have been on our minds lately. Yesterday I installed yet another new toilet seat. In each of the three apartments I’ve occupied since arriving in Nova Gorica four and a half years ago, I have at some point had to replace the rooster-interface due to breakage. Assuming some base-line of average serviceability of the seats upon my taking occupancy of the apartments, rather than extraordinarily bad luck in inheriting extremely aged and decrepit seats, this works out to a dismal average of 18 months of service life per seat
On Monday I arrived home and was invited by one of the members of the householdher their bottom. “The toilet seat pinched me!” she they explained in a tone of the highest possible pique. I had previously noticed a hairline crack in the seat before which under body weight had shown the possibility of pinching. Indeed, there was visible damage to the skin. “That’s it,” I said resolutely. “I’m replacing that toilet seat.”
Because I will be goddamned if we’ll have the pinchy kind in our own bathroom.
11 Responses
You can subscribe to comments on this post
June 1st, 2006 at 14.52 CEST+2.00
A new thing to worry about: pinchy toilets. Greeeeeat.
June 1st, 2006 at 14.53 CEST+2.00
And … English needs a neuter pronoun BADLY. What would happen if we just created one and started using it as often as possible? Wonder if it would catch on?
June 1st, 2006 at 14.58 CEST+2.00
Yes, I know we have “it” but humans don’t like being referred to as “it.”
Okay, sorry. Enough.
June 1st, 2006 at 18.49 CEST+2.00
The toilet seat is your Achilles head.
June 2nd, 2006 at 00.43 CEST+2.00
Backside-pinching toilets seats sound like male job security addendums. As one gets older, it’s still good to know there are some parts of the body that are very touchy to the least bit of pain.
June 2nd, 2006 at 03.40 CEST+2.00
Jesus, JD, don’t you know that could’ve CUT HER RIGHT IN HALF??!!
June 2nd, 2006 at 09.21 CEST+2.00
Please don’t tell Magda, but I am laughing at her ass.
June 3rd, 2006 at 02.27 CEST+2.00
1) Shouldn’t you post a picture of the damage? This is the whole reason M. did not want a “blog” in the first place.
2) “They are a prophet” –great name for a band!
June 3rd, 2006 at 21.59 CEST+2.00
@gaoo: Yeah, we considered a picture, but the idea was quickly quashed. And yes, ‘They are a prophet’ would make a great band name.
@jagosaurus: follow the link to the ‘They are a prophet’ article, and you’ll see that English does have a neuter third person pronoun, and it works, regardless of dumbassery from Strunk & White et al.
June 4th, 2006 at 11.54 CEST+2.00
This has nothing to do with any of your posts whatsoever, but I have no other forum for expressing this most dire and urgent message presently: DO NOT EVER GO TO THE CARL’S JR. HOME PAGE. EVER.
I just had to look at it for a work-related issue, and it is the most obnoxious thing I have been subjected to in some time. There is Paris Hilton soft-core, though, which might entertain some of you more than it did me.
June 4th, 2006 at 16.27 CEST+2.00
I think I am now thoroughly transformed having read the “They are a prophet” link. Seriously. I was always taught, of course, that “they” is a strictly plural pronoun. Many thanks.
(Sorry about all the typos in one of my comments. Am a sloppy typist at best.)